Be on schedule.Score better.


1.Criteria description: A complete report is presented to an excellent

1.Criteria description: 

A complete report is presented to an excellent standard with an original and detailed combination of team-level observations or individual observations will good details about what are the experience and how you or team managed those; as well as evaluations or reflections on the experience. Project critical success factors literature was well understood and studied to evaluate your experience and explored ‘why’ the experience. Meaningful recommendations for future practice, which are detailed enough for showing how exactly an issue could be dealt with. Such recommendations are clearly based on your experience and research, showing good guidance for your future study and practice. (Scoring details are in the attachment)


1500 words +-10% (exclude reference list)

Times New Roman, Calibri  font, size 12, Arial font, size 11, line spacing 1.5,Harvard format for references

Theoretical knowledge combined with real-life practice

2. Points of collection:

My role in the team is Scriptwriter, mid-term PPT and speechwriter. The results of the PPT are shown in the attachment. Other’s role include Video Capture & Edit, Voice Over, Researcher, Story-boarder, Producer, Interviewer, Planner.

① Observation/experience of a certain point:

What happened   10 marks

When did it happen/ In what situation it happened 3 marks

What is your/other’s role  2 marks

What did you or others do? 7 marks

At the moment: why or what were the motivations for you to do so? 8 marks 

What are consequences of doing so? 15 marks\

② Evaluations and reflection:

A statement of :

Did it go well/wrong?/What was positive and negative? /The impacts on project delivery or you 5 marks

Detailed reflection:

Thinking back: Why it was well /not well?/What did you/others do well/not so well in the point you mentioned? 10 marks

What theory/research can also explain why this worked well/not well? 15 marks

③Recommendation–how to avoid this failure/continue the success

What would you do in a similar situation 

Generalise the specific learning point/situation/events/ideas   5 marks

Detailed guidance of actions – What aspects of knowledge/skills do you want to develop/a step-by-step detailed method summarised 10 marks

Recommendations are supported by observation or literature  10 marks

3.Notes for your individual coursework:

You need to have both individual-level (yourself) and team-level (collective/others) learning in your report 

You need to fulfil the lower marking criteria first, then you can be considered for the next level 

For example, if your description of your events/experience is not detailed enough, even though you have a good analysis to literature, it will not be marked to 60

Good experience is also an important learning source

The nature of this report is self-reflection, so using first-person is allowed. However, your reflections cannot be subjective.

No plagiarism (including self-plagiarism)

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Our ENL Writers can help. Use the coupon code SAVE15 to get your first order at 15% OFF!

Assignment Outline