Be on schedule.Score better.

support@savemydegree.com

EN

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Aberystwyth University Town Hall Presentation to Your Community Discussion

DISCUSSION 1—In Unit 6, you had the opportunity to give a town hall presentation to your community. As the director of the local public health department, stakeholders such as academicians, health professionals, state health department staff, representatives from affected communities, and representatives from nongovernmental organizations are looking to you to understand all aspects of the strategic planning process, as well as the results of the community needs assessment.

Using terms that anyone (academician or lay person with no statistical background) could understand, concisely answer the following questions:

  1. How can you determine (prove) that the public health intervention or approach (applied to a specific community need/problem) you presented will have an effect?
  2. What is the purpose of having effective size?
  3. What is the definition of significance (significance testing)?
  4. As you make decisions about the sustainability of the intervention presented, would effect size or significance be most important in your decision-making process? Why?

DISCUSSION 2—Return to the public health pyramid in Chapter 1 of your textbook, and identify a service level. Then identify and describe an appropriate qualitative method for two stages in the planning cycle (for example, assessment, planning, monitoring, outcome evaluation). Be sure to define the qualitative method and comprehensively explain why you chose it in alignment with the service level identified

DISCUSSION 3—Review the approaches that you have taken as director of the local public health department to facilitate stakeholder (community) involvement, beginning in Unit 1. Discuss how you have involved stakeholders in the planning, development, implementation, and/or evaluation plan. In what ways did your approaches include or not include enough attention to group processes? At what key points in the planning and evaluation cycle did you make (or should have made) recommendations to improve stakeholder involvement overall?

DISCUSSION 4–Find elements of your project where inequality or bias may be an issue. How will the issues of bias and inequalities in your study be addressed?

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
In this response, we will address each of the four discussions raised in the content provided. These discussions revolve around various aspects of public health interventions and approaches, stakeholder involvement, and addressing bias and inequalities in a study. We will provide concise answers to each question, ensuring clarity and accessibility to both academic and layperson audiences.

Discussion 1:
1. To determine the effectiveness of a public health intervention or approach, various methods can be utilized. One common approach is conducting pre- and post-intervention assessments. By comparing data collected before and after the implementation of the intervention, changes in the targeted community need/problem can be observed. Additionally, statistical analyses, such as regression analysis or comparison of means, can help quantify the impact of the intervention on the desired outcome.

2. The effective size represents the magnitude or strength of the observed effect. It is a measure of the practical significance of the intervention. A larger effective size indicates a more substantial impact on the community need/problem. It allows stakeholders to understand the real-world implications of the intervention, regardless of statistical significance.

3. Significance, in the context of significance testing, refers to the statistical determination of whether the observed effects are likely to have occurred by chance. It helps establish the validity of the intervention’s impact. Significance testing involves comparing the observed data to a null hypothesis and calculating the probability of obtaining the observed results purely by chance. P-values are commonly used to assess significance, with a lower value indicating stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.

4. When making decisions about the sustainability of the intervention, both effect size and significance should be considered, but their relative importance may vary. Effect size provides valuable information about the practical impact of the intervention, helping stakeholders understand the real-world implications. On the other hand, significance testing helps determine the validity of the intervention’s impact, reducing the likelihood of spurious findings. Consequently, both measures are crucial for comprehensive decision-making, with the balance between them depending on the specific context.

Discussion 2:
Considering the public health pyramid, let’s choose the service level of “assessment.” For this stage, a suitable qualitative method is focus group discussions. Focus groups involve a moderator-led discussion with a small group of individuals from the community. These discussions help gather in-depth insights and perceptions regarding the assessed health issue. By engaging participants in an interactive and open environment, focus groups provide valuable qualitative data, exploring attitudes, beliefs, and experiences within the community. This method aligns with the assessment stage as it allows for a comprehensive understanding of the community’s perspective, facilitating the development of targeted intervention strategies.

Regarding the planning stage, a relevant qualitative method is key informant interviews. Key informants are individuals with specialized knowledge or prominent roles related to the health issue under consideration. Through individual interviews with these key informants, a deeper understanding of planning factors, available resources, and potential barriers can be gained. This method helps inform the development of effective intervention strategies by identifying key considerations from knowledgeable stakeholders.

Discussion 3:
To facilitate stakeholder involvement, various approaches have been applied throughout the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. Stakeholders have been included through regular meetings, workshops, and working groups. Their input has been actively sought during the assessment phase, with data collection methods including surveys and interviews targeting community members. During the development and implementation stages, stakeholders have provided valuable insights and feedback through collaborative decision-making processes. In the evaluation phase, stakeholders have been involved in reviewing findings, providing recommendations, and participating in dissemination activities.

However, attention to group processes should be improved to ensure enhanced stakeholder involvement. Key areas that require attention include fostering an inclusive and participatory environment, addressing power dynamics, providing clear communication channels, and acknowledging the diverse perspectives and needs of stakeholders. In addition, utilizing facilitation techniques, such as consensus-building exercises or structured discussions, could enhance collaboration among stakeholders and streamline decision-making processes.

Discussion 4:
In any project, there is a potential for inequality or bias to be present. To address these issues, several steps can be taken. Firstly, during the study design phase, ensuring diverse representation in the sample can help mitigate bias and inequalities. It is crucial to include individuals from various socio-demographic backgrounds to avoid underrepresentation or overrepresentation of certain groups.

Secondly, while collecting data, employing standardized protocols and rigorous quality assurance measures can minimize potential biases. This includes training data collectors to adhere to ethical principles, ensuring data collection tools are unbiased and culturally appropriate, and implementing rigorous data validation procedures.

Furthermore, during data analysis, conducting subgroup analyses based on relevant demographic or socioeconomic variables can help identify potential inequalities. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the intervention on different population groups.

Lastly, in the interpretation and reporting of findings, it is essential to discuss any observed biases or inequalities transparently. Acknowledging and addressing these issues in both the academic and public health communities can promote awareness, stimulate further research, and contribute to more equitable interventions.

By implementing these strategies, researchers and public health professionals can contribute to reducing bias and inequalities in their studies, ultimately striving for more inclusive and impactful interventions.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Describe how learning in this course helped you to meet

Describe how learning in this course helped you to meet Program Outcome 5: Advocates for positive health outcomes through compassionate, evidence-based, collaborative advanced nursing practice (Extraordinary Nursing). Provide at least two specific examples. Select one of the competencies from American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials Domain 6 listed below and describe how learning in

Irritable bowel syndrome provided to create a pertinent

Irritable bowel syndrome  provided to create a pertinent comprehensive evidence-based management plan for Irritable bowel syndrome and  Include the following components:  diagnostic tests medications: write a specific prescription for each medication, including over-the-counter medications suggested consults/referrals client education follow-up, including time interval and specific symptomatology to prompt a sooner return

Describe the Cultural Empowerment of the group you chose

Describe the Cultural Empowerment of the group you chose (diabetes in African Americans) Specifically address how each of the PEN-3 model’s three factors within the dimension of cultural empowerment applies to your group, and provide examples. Use subheadings to clearly show that you have addressed each of the three factors. Support your

Bad Sugar” which explores the causes and effects of diabetes

Bad Sugar” which explores the causes and effects of diabetes within two Native American communities. •  “Place Matters” which connects the dots between health, wealth, and zip codes. •  After reviewing both video transcripts, discuss how the factors listed below can influence health behaviors and health status. Support your discourse

1)Describe one internal and one external method for the

1)Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal. For example, an internal method may be the hospital board, and an external method may be a professional nursing organization. Discuss why it is important to report your change proposal to both of these groups.

Reflection Paper Each student will

                                                                        Reflection Paper                        Each student will submit a 2–3-page reflection paper. To avoid point deductions, please adhere to the following guidelines: • Title Page (does not count toward the 2-3 page limit) • Reference Page (does not count toward the 2-3 page limit) • First Person (use terms I, me,

Literature Evaluation Student Name

Literature Evaluation    Student Name  Institution Instructors Name  Due Date Literature Evaluation      Measurable Outcomes  1.     80% of patients will report an increased understanding of their diagnosis and treatment plan as measured by a post-education survey. Targeted patient education aims to improve patient knowledge and engagement in care decisions. 2.     Nurses will score an

CSUN The Significance of Micronutrients to The Body

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Discuss the importance of micronutrients and their function in the body. Choose two micronutrients and discuss the following: Why they are important to the body Signs and symptoms of toxicity and

Directions: Present the peer-reviewed journal or specialty

Directions: Present the peer-reviewed journal or specialty organization to which will submit your completed DPI Project. The peer-reviewed journal or specialty organization must be appropriate for your DPI Project. Complete the following steps: Step 1: Follow the guidelines from the peer-reviewed journal or specialty organization you selected and submit the abstract

discussion question atleast 250 words 2 references

discussion question  atleast 250 words  2 references  Reflect on the oral dissemination experience and discuss the experience with your peers. What did you learn? What can you apply from this experience to presenting as a DNP-prepared nurse in other professional forums? What advice do you have for others preparing to

Based on Payment Reforms in NYActions, discuss the findings

Based on Payment Reforms in NYActions,  discuss the findings of the report entitled, “What Ails Medicaid in New York, and answer the following questions: Does the Medicaid Redesign Team Have a Cure? Do you agree or disagree with their solution? How would you do things differently if you could? Based

Project topic -CAUTI Planning is the key to successful

Project topic -CAUTI  Planning is the key to successful completion of this course and program-related objectives. The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment requires early collaboration with the course faculty and your course preceptor. Students must establish a plan for successful completion of The required 50 community direct clinical practice experience

Planning is the key to successful completion of this course

Planning is the key to successful completion of this course and program-related objectives. The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment requires early collaboration with the course faculty and your course preceptor. Students must establish a plan for successful completion of The required 50 community direct clinical practice experience hours, 50 leadership

Research Topic: CAUTI While the implementation plan

Research Topic: CAUTI  While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue, they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.  A literature review

ANXIETY, OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE AND RELATED, AND TRAUMA AND

ANXIETY, OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE AND RELATED, AND TRAUMA AND STRESSOR-RELATED DISORDER Anxiety disorders provide a good opportunity to take a close look at the nature/nurture debate as well as the gene/environment interactions that influence the nervous system and neurochemistry. A significant part of most of Sigmund Freud’s theories, the concept of anxiety

NVCC HR Pitfalls and Solutions Discussion

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Review the slide deck, 10 Human Resources  Pitfalls  1. In your initial post (minimum 300 words) , list what you feel are the top three , why you think so, and

Reflect on GCU’s Christian worldview and articulate how the

 Reflect on GCU’s Christian worldview and articulate how the knowledge, skills, and experiences in this program, as well as the DPI Project you have completed, have prepared you to better promote or advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in health care. What principles from a Christian worldview can you apply

This week you are continuing to apply the coding skills you

This week you are continuing to apply the coding skills you have learned to services and procedures performed on the Urinary, Male and Female Reproductive systems and Maternity and Delivery. As you work on assigning codes for services performed on the Urinary system, reflect on the purpose and meaning of