Be on schedule. Score better.

EN

Critical Reflection Step 1: Capture your topic. Take a moment to think about what you identify as one of the

Critical Reflection
Step 1: Capture your topic.
Take a moment to think about what you identify as one of the most meaningful, relevant lesson presented in the course readings or supporting materials, for Weeks 1 and 2. Select a 1-2 sentence direct quotation from the applicable learning resources that references, in a germane way, the issue, idea or concept key to that lesson. This quote will become the prompt for your Critical Reflection paper. That is, it will be a focal point of your paper, representing what you identify as an important takeaway that you hope others in class will consider as a deeply important truth or lesson of this class.
To support deep reflections on the topic, and the writing of the paper, the quotation should be relevant to a topic you can tie directly to your own (or others’) experiences, observations, and critical reasoning.
It should also be something you are willing to think critically about and are willing to discuss through the writing of this paper.
Step 2: Write your reflection essay. Once you have identified the quotation prompt that will anchor your reflection, place it at the top of your paper, below the title.
Follow the quote by a line space.
On the next line begin the body of your paper.
In 300 to 400 words (organized in meaningful, well organized paragraphs) defend your belief that there is an important truth or lesson, relevant to this course, to be gleaned from this quotation. Essentially, your job is to clarify what the lesson to be learned is and to then strongly (and thoughtfully) defend why you think the lesson is vital.
To help you think about your topic and to write a well-organized essay, consider (and answer) these questions:
What truth or lesson is being communicated by this quote?
Why is this truth or lesson so important?
How do your, or other’s, experiences and observations relate to and support this truth or lesson?
In what ways does this lesson make logical sense to you?
In what ways does this lesson make emotional sense to you?
How might this lesson be relevant to your, or others’, life and career?
Why do some fail to live as if this truth or lesson were important?
Why might some suggest this truth or lesson is not important?
How would you defend the truth of this lesson from those who disagree and believe the lesson is not important?
What can we do (at an individual, community, or society) to make this truth or lesson better recognized or practiced?
In the writing of your essay, present your answer to these questions in a sequence of well-developed paragraphs (not bullet points).
You are encouraged to be creative in your reflections.
Your reflections may include, when pertinent, links to media, pictures, or other supporting resources.
Step 3: Write a Discussion Question that Would Prompt Further Dialog on the Topic. End your reflection essay with a line space and then post a single, relevant, provocative, open-ended question that you believe would prompt further debate and reflection by readers on the topic addressed in your essay.
Step 4: Give Your Reflection a Title.
Be sure to give your paper a relevant, catchy but professional title.
The title should be something creative that sparks other learners to want to read your reflection. Your title should be like a creative, but good headline.
The title should be placed at the top of Page 1 of the document.
Formatting
Prepare your Critical Reflection paper according to the following guidelines:
Structure your paper utilizing APA style; this includes headers, subheadings, in-text citations, reference page, and general paper format (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). The title of the paper should be correctly placed at the top of the page.
Post the quote at the top of the paper, following the title line, as instructed above.

Use proper in-text citation techniques. Once the quote is presented, begin the body of the essay on the next line, as directed above.
At the end of your essay, insert a line break and then present your proposed discussion question.
Submit as a single document in either Microsoft Word, PDF, or RTF format.
Your final Critical Reflection essay should be approximately 300-400 words (excluding the quote
and the reference page)
Scoring:
Title: 2 points
Quote: 8 points
Critical Reflection: 20 points
Discussion Question: 10 points
Writing mechanics (grammar, spelling, formatting, references): 10 points
Due DateNov 3, 2020 7:30 AMAttachmentsCritical Reflection Sample (2).docx (20.14 KB)Download All FilesHide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Critical Reflection
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.ContentExceptionalExceeds ExpectationsMeets ExceptionsMeets Some ExpectationsNot DoneCriterion ScoreTitle2 points
Title is properly formatted, appropriate, and relevant. Creatively captures readers attention with strong potential to spark constructive dialog
1.7 points
Title is properly formatted, appropriate, and relevant.
Title is unique, with promise to draw a readers attention to read the reflection.
1.4 points
Title is properly formatted and appropriate; could be more creative or relevant.
1.1 points
Title may or may not be properly formatted; is direct and lacks a creative edge or lacks relevance.
0 points
Title is absent, irrelevant, inappropriate, or not done.
/
2Quote8 points
Selected quote is appropriate,
relevant, and properly cited. Choice demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sourcing to develop ideas that are appropriate for the subject matter under review.
6.8 points
Selected quote is appropriate, relevant, and properly cited. Choice demonstrates use of credible, relevant sourcing to support ideas that are situated within
the subject matter under review.
5.6 points
Quote is appropriate; citation may contain errors; Choice demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sourcing to support ideas that are appropriate for
the subject matter under review.
4.4 points
Quote could be more appropriate for
the subject matter under review.
Choice demonstrates an inconsistent attempt to use sourcing to support ideas; and, citation may contain errors.
0 points
Quote is absent, irrelevant, or inappropriate.
/
8Critical Reflection20 points
Unique, clear thesis
and supporting
arguments. Information is considered critically, stated clearly and described comprehensively; analysis delivers all relevant information to demonstrate higher order thinking
and valuing.
17 points
Unique, clear thesis
and supporting
arguments.
Information is considered critically, stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
14 points
Thesis presented with supporting statements.
Information is considered critically, stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
Analysis – minor
problems
with organization,
flow, higher order
thinking and
valuing.
11 points
Information is considered on the surface without critical analysis, stated without clarification or description.
0 points
Information is inaccurate or lacks attempt at critical analysis.
Not completed.
/
20Discussion Question10 points
Single question is open-ended, thoughtful, and relevant. Questions approach invites others to think deeply on the topic.
8.5 points
Single question is open-ended,
thoughtful, relevant.
Invites responses that may or may not tap into the depth of the topic.
7 points
Question is relevant, and open-ended, and could be more thoughtful.
5.5 points
Question is relevant, but not open-ended
(i.e., it is closed-ended).
More than
one question is posed.
0 points
Question is absent, irrelevant, or
inappropriate.
/
10Writing Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling, Formatting10 points
Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning with clarity and fluency; is virtually free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
8.5 points
Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning; writing
(grammar, spelling, and formatting) has few errors
7 points
Uses language that generally conveys meaning but lacks clarity; writing (grammar, spelling, and formatting) includes some errors.
5.5 points
Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.
Moderate issues with grammar,
spelling and formatting.
0 points
Pervasive language and usage errors prevent a meaningful understanding of writing.
/
10Rubric Total ScoreTotal/
50
Overall Score
Overall Score
Level 345 points minimum
Level 230 points minimum
Level 10 points minimum
Submit Assignment
Files to submit(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.Add a FileRecord AudioCommentsSkip Toolbars for Comments.More Insert actions.Format Paragraph Address Preformatted H1 – Heading 1 H2 – Heading 2 H3 – Heading 3 H4 – Heading 4 H5 – Heading 5 H6 – Heading 6 More Text actions.More Paragraph Style actions.Font Family Arabic Transparent Arial (Recommended) Comic Sans Courier Ezra SIL Georgia SBL Hebrew Simplified Arabic Tahoma Times New Roman Traditional Arabic Trebuchet Verdana ?? (Dotum) ?? (Sim Sun) ??? (Ming Liu) Font Size 1 (8pt) 2 (10pt) 3 (12pt) 4 (14pt) 5 (18pt) 6 (24pt) 7 (36pt) Show All Components

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Our ENL Writers can help. Use the coupon code SAVE30 to get your first order at 30% off!
Students Love Us