Be on schedule.Score better.

support@savemydegree.com

EN

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

how can I  evaluate a preliminary care coordinate plan?For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed

how can I  evaluate a preliminary care coordinate plan?

For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.

Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.

For this assessment:

· Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.

Document Format and Length

Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

Supporting Evidence

Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Address three health care issues.

· Design an intervention for each health issue.

· Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.

· Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Cite specific health policy provisions.

·.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.

· Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

·; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare ProfessionalsSynthesis and Recommendations Tool Appendix HEBP

Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals Synthesis and Recommendations Tool Appendix H EBP Question: How does enhancing staff knowledge and understanding on interpreting blood drug levels, understanding contraindications, ensuring compliance, and evaluating treatment efficacy impact patient safety and continuity of care in a mental health facility?

Choose ONE contemporary moral issue in our society and apply the ethical principle of Utilitarianism to approve this moral issue. You must pick a moral

Choose ONE contemporary moral issue in our society and apply the ethical principle of Utilitarianism to approve this moral issue. You must pick a moral issue that you strongly support and apply the utilitarian claims to back up your arguments. *You must apply Bentham’s “Principle of Utility” and the Four major points of Utilitarianism

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent panel of experts—including nurses, primary care practitioners, and health behavior

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent panel of experts—including nurses, primary care practitioners, and health behavior specialists—that develops evidence-based recommendations related to preventive services. Recommendations are rated according to the strength of evidence from systematic research reviews. For this week discussion: 1. Name the most recent

Module 2 Discussion       Case Study: J.T.

Module 2 Discussion        Case Study: J.T. Purpose: Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying evidence-based research. Scenario: J.T.  is a 20 year-old who reports to you that he feels depressed and is experiencing a