Be on schedule.Score better.


Requirement for discussion board: Response and respond to at least

 Requirement for discussion board: 

Response and respond to at least one other post, offering one or two paragraphs of additional insight and details. This could be additional support for their point of view, or it could be arguing a counterpoint. 

Discussion Board of other student is below:

# – Is a cyberattack ever morally justified in response to an enemy conventional attack?

For the discussion topic on ethical considerations for cyber operations, I chose to answer questions 1 and 5.  According to Dipert (2010), cyber warfare and conventional warfare share commonality based on the uncertainty of the outcome of an attack, as well as any side effects that may occur as a result (p 385).  He also believes that the evidence you have to justify an attack should be weighed against the moral conditions for going to war in the first place (p 400).  Therefore, I believe a cyber-attack is morally justified in response to a conventional attack, especially if the war outcome is devasting and the cyber-attack is used prevent further destruction from happening.  My reason is based on Dipert’s (2010) description of cyber tactics in warfare using an electromagnetic force to disrupt a target’s radio communications, machinery, and infrastructure (p 397).  In conventional warfare the attacker is probably already known, and the evidence needed to justify deploying a cyber-attack is likely valid.  My decision to deploy a cyber-attack would be based on what might happen as a result of not stopping the attack.

# – Once a war (cyber- or conventional) has begun what kinds of cyberattacks are morally justified?

Dipert (2010) says that we should think about proportionality and likelihood of success when considering to what extent a cyber-attack is morally justified once a war has begun (p 392).  Based on this theory, proportionality means that however you decide to respond to a conflict, your response should be less harsh than what was inflicted on you (Pope, p 29).  Therefore, under the proportionality criteria the saying ‘eye for an eye’ may not be justified in response to war because it would suggest that I am trying to enforce equal treatment on target solely in retaliation.  I understand why proportionality should be considered in this case because, if not, it could lead to unnecessary casualties and economies being without resources, like food, housing, and utilities for a long period of time.  However, once the war has begun, the kinds of cyber-attacks that could be deployed morally would really depends on the severity or likelihood that the situation will only get worse if nothing is done to stop it.  For instance, I think dismantling electronic devices to prevent communication and machinery to keep it from functioning as it normally would, would be a morally justified cyber-attack.  I would consider taking down any resources that keep an enemy in power.  While I would also be concerned with noncombatant immunity and ensuring that innocent people do not endure inhumane conditions (Pope, 15), I would likely be less concerned with noncombatant immunity of a target if no other options existed for a cyber-attack to be morally justified. 

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Fears we cannot stop

Description In the book Tears We Cannot Stop, Dyson uses story-telling in his sermon to reflect on race in America. In a memoir essay that

Why you are pursuing your MSN?

Statement (under 1,000 words) that will give the admissions committee a better understanding of: 1. Why you are pursuing your MSN? To have better job


Select one of the following options and write a 5-7 page paper (1,750-2,450 words), using 1-2 of the novels we’ve read. If you work with

W5Assign0016R: Evaluating a program

When evaluating a program, there are numerous ways to collect data about its participation, impact, and success. A particularly powerful method that may be appropriate

Mansplaining On Rebecca Solnit’s Men

Explain Things to Me (METTM) Background/Context Patronize: treat with an apparent kindness that betrays a feeling of superiority. Patriarchy: a system of society or government

I need help writing 2 books with a story on

Premium Paper Help is a professional writing service that provides original papers. Our products include academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along

Human Development

Be sure to provide appropriate links so other students can access the videos, articles, etc about which you are posting. 1.) Find and post an


The writing is designed to enable further inquiry on the topic beyond the texts, capable of finding and using resources, improving skills to synthesis. COMPARATIVE

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!