The application of data analysis, reliability and validity, and assorted statistical tests used in health related research( extract the topic that fits the topic)

The DNP must have a basic understanding of statistical measurements and how they apply within the parameters of data management and analytics. This assignment will allow you to demonstrate your understanding of basic statistical tests and how to choose the appropriate test for the study being performed. You will also discuss the reliability and validity factors associated with the data sources used. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Directions: The purpose of this assignment is to write a paper including a comparison table. The table will be provided as an appendix to the final paper. Using the Library, locate a quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods article related to your DPI topic (This is my topic “Impact of ACT teams on mental illness). You may reuse articles from Topic 1 assignment. Using the “Comparative Table Template,” create a table that compares quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods articles. Provide the table as an appendix to the paper. Organize the table according to the following. Type of article. Title of the article. Type of analysis: Describe the process of analysis. There can be more than one. Applicability of test: Describe other analyses that could be used and why? Reliability and validity: Describe either the reliability and validity measures of tools used in the study or the techniques used to enhance reliability and validity in the study. Write a paper discussing the application of data analysis, reliability and validity, and assorted statistical tests used in health-related research. Include the following in your paper: State the types of study used in each article. Discuss the types of statistical tests used within each article and why they have been chosen. Discuss the applicability of the chosen statistical test and why the statistical test was chosen. Discuss the differences between parametric and nonparametric tests and how they were applied in the articles you chose. Evaluate how the factors of reliability and validity are accounted for in the articles (of instruments and surveys or in the design and data collection conducted). Summarize how the chosen studies could be applied within the context of your practice. View Rubrics Download What Are the Data Saying? – Rubric No of Criteria: 12 Achievement Levels: 5 Criteria Achievement Levels Description Percentage Unsatisfactory 0.00 % Less than Satisfactory 74.00 % Satisfactory 79.00 % Good 97.00 % Excellent 100.00 % Content 70.0 Comparison Table: Table Compares Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method Articles 10.0 A comparison table is not included. A comparison table is incomplete or incorrect. A comparison table is included but lacks details. A comparison is complete and includes sufficient detail. A comparison is complete. The comparison is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail. Types of Study 10.0 A statement of the types of studies used in each article is not included. A statement of the types of studies used in each article is incomplete or incorrect. A statement of the types of studies used in each article is included but lacks detail. A statement of the types of studies used in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail. A statement of the types of studies used in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail. Statistical Tests 10.0 A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is not included. A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is incomplete or incorrect. A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is included but lacks detail. A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail. A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail. Parametric vs. Nonparametric Tests 10.0 A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is not included. A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is incomplete or incorrect. A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is included but lacks detail. A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is complete and includes sufficient detail. A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is clearly present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail. Applicability of Statistical Tests 10.0 A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is not included. A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is incomplete or incorrect. A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is included but lacks detail. A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail. A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail. Evaluation of Reliability and Validity Factors 10.0 An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is not included. An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is incomplete or incorrect. An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is included but lacks supporting details. An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is complete and includes supporting details An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.