Be on schedule.Score better.

support@savemydegree.com

EN

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

University of Southern California Personal Teaching Philosophy Paper Nursing Assignment Help

You will revisit and revise your teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1. As part of this assignment, you should evaluate your original philosophy and include a one-page discussion of how your thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed and developed during this course. Guidelines for revising your teaching philosophy and the one-page discussion are below.

Assignment Guidelines

Revised Personal Teaching Philosophy (3–5 pages)
 

Reflect on the teaching principles and practices discussed during the course.

What did you learn about teaching that you did not know prior to this course?

What stood out as important to you over the past 8 weeks?

Consider how you might expand, adapt, or change your original philosophy to your current perspective on teaching (or you may feel compelled to take it in a completely new direction).

Your revised teaching philosophy should:

Have a clear focus or theme.

Be authentic and personal.

Relay who you are (or aspire to be) as a teacher.

  • Exhibit genuine enthusiasm for teaching.

Clearly express your current teaching values and beliefs, and discuss why you hold those values and beliefs (whether or not they have changed).

  • Describe your current teaching goals (whether or not they have changed).

Explain the teaching methods or strategies that you believe are best (whether or not they are different from your original philosophy). Note: make sure the teaching methods you find best are consistent with your goals.

  • Incorporate any new ideas and/or practices that encourage a rich teaching and learning experience.

Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy (1 page)
 

As part of this revised teaching philosophy assignment, you should include a discussion evaluating how your personal thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed during this course.

  • After you have revised your personal teaching philosophy, carefully review your original teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1 of this course.
  • Compare your original philosophy to your revised teaching philosophy and evaluate the following in a one-page written discussion:
  • Have your teaching goals, methods, or strategies changed, and if so, how and why? Have your teaching priorities and/or perspectives changed or shifted, and if so, how and why?
  • Do you value different learning experiences, and if so, what are they and why?
  • Include any additional information that may highlight how your thoughts and ideas have changed or developed during this course.
  • Include references that you found helpful, insightful, or meaningful in the development of your philosophy of teaching.
  • In addition to the course texts, include at least two outside sources from peer-reviewed journals to support your ideas.

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:

Over the course of this semester, I have had the opportunity to reflect on my teaching philosophy and explore new ideas and practices in the field of medical education. This assignment has given me the chance to evaluate and revise my teaching philosophy based on the knowledge and insights gained throughout the course. In this response, I will discuss how my thoughts and ideas about teaching have evolved and changed during this course.

Revised Personal Teaching Philosophy:

Reflecting on the principles and practices discussed during the course, I have learned several valuable lessons about teaching that I was previously unaware of. One significant realization was the importance of creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment for students. Understanding the diverse backgrounds and learning styles of students is crucial in designing effective teaching strategies.

What stood out as particularly important to me over the past 8 weeks was the recognition of the need for continuous professional development as an educator. The rapidly evolving field of medicine demands that educators stay updated with the latest research, technological advancements, and innovative teaching methods. I now acknowledge the significance of staying current in order to provide the most relevant and impactful education to my students.

With these new insights, I have expanded and adapted my original teaching philosophy to encompass my current perspective on teaching. My revised teaching philosophy now centers around the idea of nurturing independent and lifelong learners. I strive to empower my students to take ownership of their education, encouraging critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-reflection. Additionally, I emphasize the importance of fostering a collaborative learning environment where students can engage in meaningful discussions and learn from each other’s experiences.

I maintain my genuine enthusiasm for teaching and believe in the inherent potential of each student. In my revised teaching philosophy, I express my current teaching values and beliefs, which have been further solidified through this course. These values include the belief in the importance of empathy and compassion in medical education, as well as the promotion of ethical and evidence-based practice.

The teaching methods and strategies that I find best align with my goals and values. I emphasize the use of active learning techniques, such as case-based discussions, problem-based learning, and simulation exercises, to enhance student engagement and encourage practical application of knowledge. I have also incorporated new ideas and practices gained from this course, such as the integration of technology and digital resources to enhance the learning experience.

Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy:

Comparing my original teaching philosophy to my revised version, there have been notable changes in my teaching goals, methods, and strategies. I have come to realize the importance of fostering a student-centered approach, where the focus is on the individual needs and aspirations of each student. This shift has been driven by my recognition of the significance of personalized education in facilitating effective learning outcomes.

Furthermore, my teaching priorities have expanded to include the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as well as fostering cultural competency and diversity awareness among students. This change in perspective stems from the understanding that these skills and competencies are essential for healthcare professionals in an increasingly global and complex healthcare landscape.

I now value different learning experiences, particularly those that promote active and experiential learning. I have found that incorporating real-life clinical scenarios, role-plays, and hands-on practical exercises greatly enhance student learning and retention. This shift in value reflects my acknowledgment of the importance of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education.

Throughout this course, several references have been instrumental in shaping my revised teaching philosophy. The works of influential medical educators, such as Dr. Linda Nilson and Dr. Richard Felder, have provided valuable insights into effective teaching strategies and the science of learning. Additionally, peer-reviewed journals, such as Medical Education and Advances in Health Sciences Education, have offered evidence-based research and innovative approaches to medical education.

In conclusion, my teaching philosophy has undergone significant revisions and developments during this course. My focus on creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment, nurturing independent and lifelong learners, and incorporating active learning strategies has been strengthened. The importance of continuous professional development and the recognition of the evolving needs of medical students have also been highlighted. I am confident that these changes will positively impact my effectiveness as a medical educator and ultimately contribute to the success of my students.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Purpose: Understand and describe the observation,

Purpose:   Understand and describe the observation, assessment, and teaching cycle used to plan curriculum and activities for young children. (WSCC) II. Curriculum – Environment 2.j, Professional Development and Leadership- Professionalism 3.a Skill:   To plan and implement an integrated curriculum study based on the interests and needs of the children, making certain that

STUDY PLAN Can you imagine an athlete deciding to run a

STUDY PLAN Can you imagine an athlete deciding to run a marathon without training for the event? Most ambitious people who have set this goal will follow a specific training plan that will allow them to feel confident and prepared on the big day. Similarly, if you want to feel

Discuss what you learned regarding community treatment

Discuss what you learned regarding community treatment options. What scenarios can you envision having to use any of them? How would you morally, ethically, and legally navigate a patient who you deem appropriate for residential treatment but who is refusing?

Part 1 Case 1 A 5-year-old girl has had a cough and runny

 Part 1 Case 1 A 5-year-old girl has had a cough and runny nose (yellowish discharge) for the past 3 days. Her mother brought her for an evaluation as her left eye became pink and the right eye is also starting to get pink. Her daughter keeps rubbing them. The

Write a Research Paper on creatine’s effect on cognition.

Write a Research Paper on creatine’s effect on cognition. Find at least 3 review articles pertaining to your topic Find at least 3 Original Research articles pertaining to your topic  The Final project is an 8+ page paper (12 point, Times New Roman, double spaced) APA FORMAT STEPS FOR PAPER

UM Kadlec Medical Center v Lakeview Anesthesia Associates

Read Chapter 8 (attached) and discuss the following 2 questions.  What implications does the decision on Kadlec Medical Center v. Lakeview Anesthesia Associates have on the quality of care in the instance of this case?   What implications does the verdict of this case have on the future of quality

Follow the instructions below to complete your Week 5 –

Follow the instructions below to complete your Week 5 – Assignment AHow can I design and deliver an effective PowerPoint presentation?  Link to Prior Knowledge: This assignment helps you apply your knowledge from this week’s modules and textbook readings. Career Connection: Healthcare employees are expected to communicate important information in

A 78-year-old male patient comes to your office complaining

A 78-year-old male patient comes to your office complaining of increased left knee pain for the past 3 to 4 months. He has had no history of recent injury. An x-ray done less than 4 months ago showed degenerative osteoarthritic changes. He has full range of motion and denies any

NVCC Commentary on The Patient Medical Information Proposal

For this week’s discussion posts, you’ll comment on a proposed Federal regulation  First, you’ll identify a piece of proposed legislation from https://www.regulations.gov/. Then, you’ll have to review the websites on how to comment on a proposed legislation.  Finally, you’ll write a comment on your proposed legislation and post to the

UA Benefits And Challenges Of Group Psychotherapy

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. What are the benefits and the challenges of offering group psychotherapy services within both inpatient and outpatient clinical environments?

Overview Even before the Affordable Care Act was enacted,

Overview Even before the Affordable Care Act was enacted, the government-run Medicare and the state-run Medicaid programs extended healthcare services to all U.S. citizens above age 65, to citizens with disabilities, and to citizens belonging to low-income groups. Considering the rising cost of healthcare services, create a PowerPoint presentation comparing

NSG 6101 MDC Use of Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks

Discussion Question Visit online library and review these two articles. Connelly, L. M. (2014). Use of theoretical frameworks in research. MEDSURG Nursing, 23(3), 187-188. Green, H. E. (2014). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 34-38. Next, review the evidence you are collecting for your

SU Resistance in The Oka Legacy Case Presentation

Scenario You are the chief marketing officer at Pleasant Hills Hospital. Your hospital has merged with Southside Hospital, another facility in the same area of the city. As part of the merger, both hospitals agreed to give up their names and logos in favor of a new, revitalized brand identity.

CSUN Nutritional Evaluation Part of Medical Care Discussion

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Develop a substantial initial post addressing all the points below: Explain the components of a nutritional assessment. What important subjective and objective assessment findings will assist a nurse in developing a

USC Health & Medical Common Respiratory Diagnosis Paper

Debra, a 56-year-old female, comes to the clinic complaining of a cold she has had for several weeks that just will not go away. She states she has a dry hacking cough, muscle aches, and a headache. While it is very hot outside, she is shivering with a sweater on.

NSG 6101 MDC Technology Driven Adherence in Chronic Care

Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned, write a (2-3 pages) paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. This week you will submit the Literature Review section of your proposal. Each week you have been adding to your growing body of evidence to support your problem and

Subject : LEGAL & ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTHCARE Course :

Subject : LEGAL & ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTHCARE Course : health care managment 1) This is a full case study assignment. It is expected that you follow the diagnosis + describe + defend method. I recommend that at least 50% of your assignment is the defence of your solution. 2)